The Ohada Common Court of Justice and Arbitration: Exogenous Forces Contributing to Its Influence
نویسنده
چکیده
The Common Court of Justice and Arbitration (CCJA) is the supranational, apex court of the Organization for the Harmonization in Africa of Business Laws (OHADA), an organization that currently covers seventeen countries in West and Central Africa. OHADA is the French-language acronym for this organization’s title and specifically refers to harmonization; nevertheless, the organization’s purpose is to make those laws uniform, not just harmonized. Its larger purpose is to encourage economic development. Embedded within OHADA, the CCJA is different in important ways from the other international courts (ICs) discussed in this issue. No other IC is in the same way an integral part of its member states’ national judicial systems: within its jurisdiction to review laws, which covers only OHADA laws, the CCJA functions as the highest national court of its member states. This includes receipt of appeals from private litigants and decisions of cases on the merits. In contrast, although the European Court of Justice can receive cases from private parties, it decides a point of law—akin to a certified question—after which the case returns to the national court for further adjudication. Additionally, the CCJA’s jurisdiction over OHADA laws, which is thus limited to specific business laws, sets this court apart from other ICs. Although the World Trade Organization’s dispute-resolution system is in practice the
منابع مشابه
Application of Lex Mercatoria as Applicable Law in International Commercial Arbitration
In settling disputes regarding international commercial arbitration the parties may instead of choosing the law of one country to choose lex mercatoria or the law of merchants as a applicable law to the disputes. When this choice is possible that applicable choice of law rules recognize such power for the parties. The principle of autonomy is choosing lex mercatoria has been recognized in many ...
متن کاملدخالت دادگاهها در رسیدگیهای داوری در حقوق ایران
In case of existing a reliable agreement the courts do not have jurisdiction to consider the settlement of the case. So, the effect of arbitration agreement is to exclude the jurisdiction of state courts. The exclusion of court jurisdiction is not meant the absolute non-intervention in arbitration proceedings. Arbitration may not exist without a degree of court intervention. But, this interve...
متن کاملماهیت مدیریت جریان داوری توسط مراکز داوری و قانون حاکم بر آن
Abstract With increasing tendency in international commercial arbitration, the role of arbitration institutes and centers is highly considered in arbitral affairs. These centers consider various applications for themselves within the framework of rules and regulations ranging from “offering office services” to “arbitration process management”. With arbitration process management, the arbitra...
متن کاملUndermining Justice: The Two Rises of Freedom of Contract and the Fall of Equity*
This article explores a crucial moment in American legal history, known as the Lochner era, in which the rise of freedom of contract was sharp enough to defeat equity concerns, and then argues that a second rise of the freedom of contract has recently been developed by the Supreme Court in the domain of arbitration agreements. It contends that this second rise is not only a revival of Lochneris...
متن کاملPeaceful methods of The International Disputes Settlement and their impact on the development of international trade; With Emphasizing on the scope of the energy industry
International trade litigation represents, the extent to which countries participate in international trade, as well as its business activities on various economic issues. Since energy is one of main pillars of international trade, settlement international disputes can play an important role in international trade.This is especially evident in the energy sector, which plays an important role in...
متن کامل